Mother of A 7 Year Old with Episodes of Tummy Pain and Pallor — Free SCA Practice Case
Mother of a 7 year old with episodes of tummy pain and pallor
Station Timer
Golden Minute
Initial Introduction
•Introduce yourself
•Ask an open question — "How can I help you today?"
•Listen — don't interrupt
•Catch early cues
Data Gathering
History, ICE & Diagnosis
Clinical Management
Diagnosis, Plan & Decisions
Safety Net
Follow-up & Close
Five cases are free: a live 12-minute consultation with an AI patient each, marked, and no card.
Materials for Candidate
Please review before starting the consultation
Full Name
Felix Farrington
Age
7 years
Consultation Type
TelephoneAge
7
Situation
Telephone Consultation. His mother has booked a routine appointment.
Reason for Encounter
"Felix keeps getting severe tummy pain. Nobody has seen him during an attack and nothing has been found. I want him scanned."
Medical Records (Felix)
- ●PMH: Infant eczema, resolved. Immunisations up to date.
- ●Medications: None. Allergies: NKDA.
- ●Growth (school nurse, 4 months ago): 24.0 kg, 122 cm, both around the 50th centile.
Recent Notes
- ●Practice nurse, 4 months ago: Abdominal pain two days earlier, well on the day. Urine dipstick normal. No blood tests.
- ●NHS 111, 3 weeks ago: Telephone call during an episode of abdominal pain. Given home care advice and told to contact the surgery if it continued. Not seen in person.
Patient Script
For the friend playing the patient role
Character Overview: You are Joanna Farrington, a 38 year old office manager at a firm of solicitors, phoning about your son Felix, who is 7 and in Year 3. You live with your husband Greg, who works in IT sales and travels a lot, Felix and his sister Elodie, who is 4. You run a busy office and you are used to getting things sorted. You are brisk, articulate and a bit sharp, and you have written yourself a list of points. You are not rude, but you are frustrated that nobody has ever seen Felix while he is actually in pain. You rang 111 once and took him to the practice nurse once, and nobody has told you what the pain is. You think a scan is the obvious next step and you will push for it politely and firmly. You soften when the doctor gives you a clear explanation, takes your list seriously and does not talk down to you. You speak quickly and tidily, in full sentences.
Opening Sentence: "Hello, it's about my son Felix, he's seven. He keeps getting these attacks of tummy pain where he goes white as a sheet and just wants to lie in the dark. Nobody has seen him while it's happening and nothing has been found, which frankly isn't good enough. I'd like him booked in for a scan."
History if Asked (Data Gathering Phase)
- ●How it started: "The first one was about five months ago, on a Saturday afternoon. He suddenly said his tummy hurt, bent over and went quiet. Since then he's had five attacks altogether. The last was three weeks ago."
- ●How often: "Roughly once a month, but it's not regular. The gap has been anything from three weeks to six weeks. There's no pattern I can see."
- ●The pain: "He points to the middle of his tummy, a bit above and around the belly button. He says it's a squeezing, really bad pain, so bad that he curls up and can't talk or play. It stays in the middle and doesn't move to one side or down to the right."
- ●How long it lasts: "Usually three to five hours. The worst one was about seven. Then it just stops and he goes to sleep, and by the next morning he's completely himself."
- ●What he is like during an attack: "Grey and drawn, with dark circles under his eyes. He stops playing, curls up on the sofa and won't eat. He feels sick, and twice he was sick once, clear, nothing green. He wants the curtains shut and the telly off, and he hates noise and light. He just wants me nearby and quiet."
- ●Headache: "Now you say it, he sometimes says his head hurts a bit towards the end. It's mild."
- ●Between attacks: "He's totally normal. Running about, eating like a horse, playing football. That's what makes it so odd."
- ●What starts an attack: "I can't see anything definite. A couple of times it came after a busy day when he hadn't had much breakfast. One followed a school trip. No particular food that I've noticed."
- ●What has helped: "Not much. I gave him paracetamol once, about two hours in, and it didn't touch it. Lying in a dark room and sleeping is what ends it."
- ●Travel sickness: "Yes, he's always been car sick. I keep a bag in the car."
- ●Bowels and wee: "Normal. He goes every day, soft, no straining. Wee is normal and he's not complained of stinging."
Ideas, Concerns, Expectations
Gating note: Joanna does not volunteer any of this. Each part comes out only when the doctor asks what she thinks is going on, what is worrying her, or what she was hoping for.
- ●Ideas: She thinks it must be something physical that nobody has found, such as his appendix, a blockage or a problem with his bowel. A friend's child had months of tummy pain that ended up being a bowel condition. "A friend's little girl had pains for ages and it turned out to be her bowel. Nobody picked it up at first. I don't want that to be us."
- ●Concerns: She fears something serious is being missed because nobody has ever seen him during an attack: the nurse saw him afterwards and 111 was only a phone call. She is also worried about school, because his attendance has dropped and she has had a standard letter about it. She is privately afraid of being thought a fussy mother. "Nobody's seen him when it's actually happening. And school have written to me about his attendance, which is ridiculous."
- ●Expectations: She came for a scan and expects a referral if the scan finds nothing. She also wants something in writing that she can show the school. "A scan, or at least a referral to someone who can do one. And I need a letter for school."
If Asked: Medical History and Medications
Gating note: Joanna answers each of these plainly when the doctor asks about it.
- ●Past health: Born at term, a bit of eczema as a baby that cleared. Immunisations done. No operations and no hospital stays.
- ●Medicines and allergies: None regular. Paracetamol only, rarely. No allergies.
- ●Family history: If asked about illness in the family, she says her husband Greg gets "horrible heads" about every month or two, with flashing lights first, and has to lie down in a dark room. She dismisses it: "That's hardly relevant to a seven year old's tummy." Greg's sister has the same. No bowel disease or coeliac disease in the family.
- ●What has been done so far: Practice nurse, 4 months ago: she saw him two days after an attack, when he was completely well, tested his urine, which was normal, and said it might be constipation. No blood tests were done. NHS 111, 3 weeks ago: you rang during the last attack and an adviser asked questions by phone and said to keep him comfortable and ring the surgery the next day if it was still bad. By then he was well, so you did not. Nobody has examined him during an attack, no blood tests have been done and nobody has done a scan.
Social History and Lifestyle Impact
- ●School: He has missed about six days this term and arrived late on others, and school sent an attendance letter. His teacher, Mrs Anand, has been kind but is unsure what to do when he comes in tired after an attack. He has twice been sent home from school mid attack.
- ●Felix himself: Cheerful and sporty. In the last month he has started asking "Is it going to happen today?" on school mornings. No bullying, friends fine, no trouble at home.
- ●Home: Greg is away two nights a week, so most attacks fall to you, and you are tired.
- ●Routine: He sleeps about ten hours. He sometimes skips breakfast when rushed, and drinks squash rather than water.
- ●Availability to be seen: You can bring him to the surgery tomorrow after school at about four, or on Thursday morning if you phone work.
If Asked: Associated Symptoms
Gating note: Joanna answers these only when asked. Every one is negative unless stated.
- ●If asked about weight loss, poor appetite between attacks or slow growth: "No. He's eating well and he's grown. His uniform is getting short."
- ●If asked about green or bile stained vomit, blood in the vomit, blood in the stool or black stools: "No. Never."
- ●If asked about pain waking him from sleep, or an attack starting at night: "No. They've all started in the daytime or early evening and he sleeps through normally."
- ●If asked about diarrhoea, constipation, mucus or a swollen tummy: "No, his bowels are regular and normal."
- ●If asked about fever, a rash, joint pain, mouth ulcers or eye redness: "No, none of that."
- ●If asked about urine, burning, bedwetting or testicle or groin pain: "No, all normal. He hasn't complained of anything like that."
- ●If asked about a recent knock to the tummy, travel abroad, or excessive thirst: "No."
Responses to Management (The Negotiation Phase)
- ●If the doctor explains what they think is going on:
- ●Reaction: Sceptical but listening. "Right. Is that actually a proper thing, or is it what you say when you don't know?" If it is described as a recognised pattern in children with a matching family history: "Greg's migraines, well. I suppose I hadn't put those together."
- ●If the doctor explains why a scan is not needed:
- ●Reaction: Challenging. "But how can you be sure without looking? Nobody's scanned him, and nobody's even seen him during one." If told that scans are for children with warning features, that the pattern and his normal growth and urine test fit, and that scans can mislead or expose him to radiation: "I just don't want to find out in a year that it was something we could have caught." She accepts it if the doctor offers to examine him in person, says exactly which signs would change the plan, and agrees to review.
- ●If the doctor says Felix needs to be seen and examined:
- ●Reaction: Relieved to be taken seriously. "Yes, I'd like someone to actually examine him. Tomorrow at four works. But what happens when he's in the middle of one? Nobody has ever seen him like that." She is satisfied by a clear plan for how he can be seen if an attack starts in surgery hours. If the doctor asks her to feel his tummy or check anything herself, she declines: "I wouldn't know what I was feeling for. Can't you do it when he's here?"
- ●If the doctor discusses treatment and prevention:
- ●Reaction: Practical. "So what do I give him when it starts? Paracetamol did nothing." If told to give a simple painkiller early and keep it dark and quiet: "How soon? And how often is too often?" She asks, "Is there something he could take every day to stop them?" and reacts with unease to the idea of a daily tablet. "I'd rather not if we can avoid it." She is fine with a diary and regular meals.
- ●If the doctor discusses school:
- ●Reaction: Immediately engaged. "Can you write something for school? I want them to understand it's real and stop sending me letters." If offered a letter and a plan for what school should do when an attack starts: "Should he go in the next day, or stay at home?" She agrees to speak to Mrs Anand.
- ●If the doctor describes the outlook or gives safety netting:
- ●Reaction: Wants specifics. "Will he grow out of it? What would make me take him straight to A&E?" If safety netting is vague, such as "come back if it gets worse": "Worse how? His attacks are already bad. What exactly do I look for?" She repeats back clear instructions accurately.
Mark Scheme
Domain 1: Data Gathering and Diagnosis
Domain 2: Clinical Management and Medical Complexity
Domain 3: Relating to Others
Clinical Learning Points
The Core Dilemma and the Model Plan
- ●Felix is a well, growing 7 year old with five episodes of severe central tummy pain over about five months, each lasting a few hours with pallor, nausea and a wish for a dark quiet room, and complete wellness in between. His father has migraines. His mother arrives frustrated that nobody has seen him during an attack, after one 111 call and one practice nurse visit, and wants a scan. The station tests recognising a pattern, holding a line on imaging without dismissing a worried parent, and supporting school.
- ●The model plan has six parts. Take a history that confirms the pattern and screens thoroughly for red flags. Name the likely diagnosis, abdominal migraine, and explain it plainly using the family history. Decide that a scan is not needed now, and give reasons specific to Felix. Arrange an in person examination with growth plotting and a urine dipstick, limiting any further tests to what the findings justify. Give a plan for attacks, a diary and a school letter. Finish with specific safety netting and a planned review.
- ●Acceptable alternatives: examining him in person first and giving the diagnosis at that visit, or giving a working diagnosis on the phone and confirming it after examination. Checking coeliac serology is reasonable if symptoms persist; it is not required on this history. A paediatric referral now is acceptable if the candidate explains why, but it is not needed for a first assessment of a typical story. Neither a scan nor a daily preventive tablet is expected today.
Recognising Abdominal Migraine
- ●Abdominal migraine is a recognised childhood condition within the migraine spectrum, listed among the functional gastrointestinal disorders of childhood (Rome IV). It is characterised by stereotyped, sudden episodes of intense central abdominal pain lasting hours, separated by well periods of weeks to months, with features such as pallor, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, headache and light sensitivity, and no other explanation.
- ●The Rome IV diagnostic criteria for abdominal migraine in children require all of the following, occurring at least twice, with the criteria met for at least six months before the diagnosis is made: paroxysmal episodes of intense, acute abdominal pain that is periumbilical, midline or diffuse and lasts an hour or more, which is the most severe and distressing symptom; episodes separated by weeks to months; pain that is incapacitating and interferes with normal activities; a stereotyped pattern and symptoms in the individual child; pain with two or more of loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, headache, light sensitivity and pallor; and, after appropriate medical evaluation, symptoms that cannot be fully explained by another medical condition.
- ●Felix fits this picture: five stereotyped episodes, central pain so severe that he curls up and cannot talk or play, pallor, nausea, vomiting twice, light and noise avoidance, mild late headache and travel sickness, with a father and aunt who have migraine. His first attack was about five months ago, just short of the six months the criteria ask for, which is one more reason to call it a working diagnosis and confirm it at review. It typically starts in primary school age children. Many children outgrow it, and some go on to have headache migraine later.
- ●It is a diagnosis made on the pattern after considering alternatives, not a diagnosis of exclusion that needs a battery of tests. Appropriate medical evaluation here means the history, an examination with growth plotted and a urine dipstick, with blood tests only if the findings justify them. The candidate should say that it is a working diagnosis and that the picture would be reconsidered if new features appear.
Screening for Red Flags and Weighing the Alternatives
- ●In a child with recurrent abdominal pain, the features that point away from a benign pattern are weight loss or faltering growth, persistent vomiting or bile stained vomit, blood in the vomit or stool, pain that wakes him at night, pain fixed to one place, fever, urinary symptoms, testicular pain, persistent diarrhoea, and joint, mouth, skin or eye problems. Each is negative for Felix.
- ●The alternatives to weigh include constipation, urinary tract infection, coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, intermittent obstruction such as malrotation with volvulus, and appendicitis. Felix has daily soft stools, so constipation does not explain the pain (NICE CKS Constipation in children is the reference if stool pattern is in doubt). His urine was normal at the practice nurse visit, his growth is normal and he is well between attacks. No blood tests have been done.
- ●No blood tests have been done, and none is required to make the diagnosis in a well, growing child with no red flags. A limited first line set, such as a full blood count and CRP, is reasonable if the examination or growth raises a question. Coeliac testing is advised by NICE NG20 for children with persistent unexplained abdominal or gastrointestinal symptoms, so a candidate may offer it, but it is not a pass requirement here. A wide battery of tests is not appropriate.
Why a Scan Is Not the Answer
- ●Imaging is not indicated in a well child with a characteristic pattern, normal growth, a normal examination, a normal urine test and no red flags. A scan would be unlikely to change the diagnosis or the plan. An abdominal ultrasound between attacks will usually be normal, and a normal result may add to anxiety without explaining anything. A CT scan carries radiation exposure and is not used for this.
- ●The explanation matters as much as the decision. The argument that persuades is specific to Felix: he is growing, eating and playing between attacks, his urine test was normal, and his attacks follow a stereotyped pattern. The candidate should also be honest that red flags or a change in the pattern would change the decision, and that a scan is a tool for certain questions, not a way to be reassured.
- ●Nobody has seen him during an attack. The nurse saw him two days afterwards, when he was well, and 111 was a telephone call, which is why neither gave a diagnosis. That is useful to name, because it validates her sense that nothing was explained without agreeing that something was missed.
Examination and Proportionate Tests
- ●A telephone consultation cannot establish that the abdomen is soft and non tender between attacks, plot growth, or check for masses, organomegaly or perianal problems. The model answer arranges an in person assessment soon, including abdominal examination, measuring height and weight against the centile chart, and a urine dipstick.
- ●Tests beyond this should be proportionate to what the examination finds. No blood tests have been done yet. They are not needed to make the diagnosis, and any that are requested should be few and justified by the examination or growth. Candidates who order a wide range of investigations to reassure the mother have missed the point; candidates who diagnose without ever examining him have also missed it.
Managing Attacks, Triggers and Prevention
- ●For an attack, the British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) migraine summary advises conservative management with trigger avoidance (missed meals, dehydration, irregular sleep) and simple analgesia, paracetamol or an NSAID, usually ibuprofen. Giving it at the start of an attack is sensible practice; Felix's mother gave it two hours in. Rest in a dark quiet room and sleep ends most attacks.
- ●The BNFC also warns of medication overuse headache with frequent analgesic use, so painkillers should be limited to a few days a month, not given daily. Opioids have no place.
- ●A diary of dates, duration, triggers, food and sleep helps to judge frequency and identify triggers such as skipped breakfast, tiredness and busy days. Regular meals, more water than squash and a regular sleep routine are reasonable. Elimination diets are not supported.
- ●Preventive medicine (BNFC lists propranolol, pizotifen and others, with limited evidence in children) is a specialist decision for frequent or disabling attacks; NICE CKS on migraine likewise says preventive treatment should not be started in primary care for children. At this stage with five attacks in five months, it is not needed. Referral to a paediatrician is appropriate if attacks become more frequent, disabling or atypical, or if the diagnosis is in doubt.
School and Wellbeing
- ●School is part of the testing point. Felix has missed about six days, was sent home mid attack twice and has an attendance letter. A letter from the practice that explains a recognised medical pattern, together with a plan, helps school treat the absences appropriately: a quiet place and a call to a parent when an attack begins, return when he is well, and no penalty. A school nurse contact or an individual healthcare plan can be offered.
- ●His worry on school mornings is a consequence of attacks that arrive unpredictably. It should be acknowledged and monitored without labelling the attacks as psychological or telling him that they are imagined. Attention to anxiety, sleep and regular routines is part of migraine management in children.
Safety Netting and Follow Up
- ●Specific safety netting is essential after a decision to avoid a scan. Call 999 or take him to A&E straight away for green or bloody vomit, blood in the stool, a hard swollen tummy, constant pain in one place especially the lower right, drowsiness, floppiness, or pain that has not eased after a full day or is accompanied by fever. Contact the surgery the same day for weight loss, pain that wakes him at night, new diarrhoea or constipation, or new urinary symptoms.
- ●Arrange review in person with the diary, within about four to six weeks or after the next attack, and make a plan for earlier review. Note the 111 report and the nurse visit in his notes. A typical attack that settles with painkillers and rest at home does not need an A&E visit. Because her frustration is that nobody has seen him during an attack, a candidate may reasonably agree how he can be seen if one starts in surgery hours, such as ringing the surgery that morning for a same day assessment, so that someone can examine him while he has symptoms. This is helpful but not required.
Common Mistakes in This Station
- ●Agreeing to a scan to calm the mother, or refusing one without giving reasons tied to Felix.
- ●Accepting the earlier suggestion of constipation without checking his stool pattern.
- ●Skipping the red flag screen, or asking only about vomiting and fever.
- ●Ordering a wide set of blood tests or imaging because none has been done yet.
- ●Not asking about family history, so the migraine link is missed.
- ●Diagnosing entirely on the phone without arranging an examination.
- ●Starting daily preventive medicine at the first consultation, or advising opioids.
- ●Offering sympathy about school without a letter or a plan, or advising time off between attacks.
- ●Vague safety netting such as "come back if it gets worse", with no disposition attached.
- ●Treating the mother's persistence as difficult behaviour instead of a worry that needs explanation.
Mapped to the RCGP curriculum topic: Patient < 19 years old.
← Back to Free SCA Practice Cases